Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon E5-4627 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon E5-4627 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2660 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,055 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 135W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,969 vs 13,039).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 135W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2660 v3 better than Xeon E5-4627 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2660 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2660 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2660 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2660 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2660 v3 comes in $1,055 cheaper on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 73.9% better value on MSRP (9.0 vs 5.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-4627 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon E5-4627 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2660 v3

The Xeon E5-2660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,039 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4627 v4

The Xeon E5-4627 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,969 points. Launch price was $2,225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2660 v3 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4627 v4's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 scores 13,039 against the Xeon E5-4627 v4's 12,969 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-4627 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 10
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	25 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+10140%	2.5 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	13,039	12,969
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,105
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,936

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — the Xeon E5-4627 v4 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-4627 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) and C610 (Xeon E5-4627 v4).

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	1536 GB+100%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2660 v3) vs Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2660 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon E5-4627 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 was priced at $1445, while the Xeon E5-4627 v4 came in at $2500. On launch pricing ($1445 vs $2500), Xeon E5-2660 v3 was $1055 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2660 v3 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4627 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2660 v3 the 54% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP	$1445-42%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	9.0+73%	5.2
Release Date	2014	2016

Search Xeon E5-2660 v3 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4627 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.