Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4114

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4114 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4114: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2660 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB).
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,039 vs 13,097).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 21.4 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $612 MSRP).
❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4114

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $833 less on MSRP ($612 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Delivers 137.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.4 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($612 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 25 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4114 better than Xeon E5-2660 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2660 v3 is ahead with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4114 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2660 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4114 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4114 is the better buy right now. Xeon Silver 4114 comes in $833 cheaper on MSRP at $612 MSRP versus $1,445 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2660 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 137.2% better value on MSRP (21.4 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4114 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Xeon Silver 4114 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2660 v3

The Xeon E5-2660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,039 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4114

The Xeon Silver 4114 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,097 points. Launch price was $694.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Xeon Silver 4114 share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4114 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 scores 13,039 against the Xeon Silver 4114's 13,097 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4114. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Silver 4114.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon Silver 4114
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+10%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+18%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+82%	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+2460%	10 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	13,039	13,097

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4114 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon Silver 4114 — the Xeon Silver 4114 supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 768 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4114). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4114) — the Xeon Silver 4114 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) and Intel C621 (Xeon Silver 4114).

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon Silver 4114
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	768 GB
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	48+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2660 v3) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4114). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2660 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon Silver 4114
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2660 v3 was priced at $1445, while the Xeon Silver 4114 came in at $612. On launch pricing ($1445 vs $612), Xeon Silver 4114 was $833 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2660 v3 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 21.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4114 — making the Xeon Silver 4114 the 81.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v3	Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP	$1445	$612-58%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	21.4+138%
Release Date	2014	2017

Search Xeon E5-2660 v3 on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4114 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.