Xeon E5-4667 v4
VS
Ryzen 5 8640U

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Ryzen 5 8640U

Intel

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 Cores36 Thrd135 WWMax: 3 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 8640U

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-4667 v4

#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
135%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
135%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
132%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
126%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
124%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
122%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
107%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
104%
#77
Xeon E5-4667 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 8640U (2023) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-4667 v4Ryzen 5 8640U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-4667 v4Ryzen 5 8640U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-4667 v4 and Ryzen 5 8640U

Intel

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4667 v4 scores 20,319 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.

FeatureXeon E5-4667 v4Ryzen 5 8640U
Cores / Threads
18 / 36+200%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.9 GHz+63%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
45 MB+181%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4.5 MB+350%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
PassMark
20,319
20,274
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,675
Geekbench 6 Single
2,519
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,308
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-4667 v4Ryzen 5 8640U
Socket
LGA2011
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7500
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.

FeatureXeon E5-4667 v4Ryzen 5 8640U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 760M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V (SVM)
Target Use
Productivity