Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon W-2150B

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon W-2150B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon W-2150B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+227.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 14 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,486).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2150B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2150B better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Yes. Xeon W-2150B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2150B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2150B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2150B is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2150B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $499 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (41.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2150B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016), more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 18/36, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon W-2150B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

Xeon W-2150B

The Xeon W-2150B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-2150B offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2150B — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2150B (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2150B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4667 v4 scores 20,319 against the Xeon W-2150B's 20,486 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W-2150B. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2150B.

Feature	Xeon E5-4667 v4	Xeon W-2150B
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+80%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	45 MB+227%	13.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4.5 MB+350%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	20,319	20,486
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,463
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,410
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2150B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.