Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6334

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 135W instead of 165W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,512).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6334

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 45 MB).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 165W vs 135W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6334 better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6334 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6334 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6334 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

Xeon Gold 6334

The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6334 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6334 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4667 v4 scores 20,319 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6334. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.

Feature	Xeon E5-4667 v4	Xeon Gold 6334
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+125%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	45 MB+150%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4.5 MB+350%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	20,319	20,512

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.