Xeon E5450 vs Xeon X5460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5450 vs Xeon X5460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5450 vs Xeon X5460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5450

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,581 vs 2,582).

Xeon X5460

2007

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5460 better than Xeon E5450?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5450 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5460 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5460 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5460 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon X5460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5450 vs Xeon X5460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5450

The Xeon E5450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,581 points. Launch price was $915.

Xeon X5460

The Xeon X5460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.16 GHz, with boost up to 0.17 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,582 points. Launch price was $1,172.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5450 and Xeon X5460 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5450 versus 0.17 GHz on the Xeon X5460 — a 178.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5450 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.16 GHz). Both are built on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5450 scores 2,581 against the Xeon X5460's 2,582 — a 0% lead for the Xeon X5460. Both processors carry 12 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5450	Xeon X5460
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+1665%	0.17 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.16 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	12 MB L2 Cache	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Harpertown (2007−2008)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,581	2,582