Core i3-7102E vs Xeon E5450

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-7102E vs Xeon E5450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-7102E vs Xeon E5450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-7102E

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 80W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5450, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Xeon E5450 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5450

2007

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,581 vs 2,599).
❌220% higher power demand at 80W vs 25W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-7102E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7102E better than Xeon E5450?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5450 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-7102E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7102E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-7102E is the better buy right now. Core i3-7102E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $225 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5450 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7102E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-7102E vs Xeon E5450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

Xeon E5450

The Xeon E5450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,581 points. Launch price was $915.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-7102E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5450 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5450. The Core i3-7102E uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5450 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-7102E scores 2,599 against the Xeon E5450's 2,581 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-7102E. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5450.

Feature	Core i3-7102E	Xeon E5450
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB (total)+1100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,599	2,581
Cinebench R23 Multi	659	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i3-7102E) / not specified (Xeon E5450). The Core i3-7102E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5450 requires a dedicated GPU.