Xeon E5462
VS
Phenom II X4 920

Xeon E5462 vs Phenom II X4 920

Intel

Xeon E5462

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 920

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5462 is positioned at rank 955 and the Phenom II X4 920 is on rank 289, so the Phenom II X4 920 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5462

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
32121%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6065%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5388%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4163%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
99%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
97%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
95%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
94%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
93%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
93%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
100%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
98%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
97%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
94%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
94%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
94%
#969
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
90%
#970
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 920

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4247%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4013%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2914%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
878%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
695%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
608%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
348%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
344%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
313%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
313%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
310%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
301%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
297%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
296%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
293%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
100%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
100%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
100%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
98%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
98%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
97%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
97%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
97%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
96%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
96%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
95%
#289
Phenom II X4 920
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($45) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5462 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5462Phenom II X4 920
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 920 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($45 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5462Phenom II X4 920
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($45)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5462 and Phenom II X4 920

Intel

Xeon E5462

The Xeon E5462 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $797.

AMD

Phenom II X4 920

The Phenom II X4 920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,202 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5462 and Phenom II X4 920 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5462 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 920 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5462 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5462 scores 2,213 against the Phenom II X4 920's 2,202 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5462. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5462 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 920.

FeatureXeon E5462Phenom II X4 920
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,213
2,202
Geekbench 6 Single
363
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,239
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5462 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 920 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5462Phenom II X4 920
Socket
LGA771
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Xeon E5462) / not specified (Phenom II X4 920). Primary use case: Xeon E5462 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E5462 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

FeatureXeon E5462Phenom II X4 920
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server