Xeon E5472 vs Xeon X5365

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5472 vs Xeon X5365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5472 vs Xeon X5365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5472

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5365 across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon X5365

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,331 vs 2,333).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5472 better than Xeon X5365?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon X5365 is ahead with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 27 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5472 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5472 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5472 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5472 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5472 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5472 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5472 vs Xeon X5365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5472

The Xeon E5472 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $1,022.

Xeon X5365

The Xeon X5365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,331 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5472 is built on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5472 scores 2,333 against the Xeon X5365's 2,331 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5472. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5472 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5365.

Feature	Xeon E5472	Xeon X5365
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	3 GHz	—
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB L2 Cache+50%	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)	—
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Harpertown (2007−2008)	—
PassMark	2,333	2,331