Core i7-1060G7 vs Xeon E5472

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Xeon E5472 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Xeon E5472: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 9W instead of 80W, a 71W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics, while Xeon E5472 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,322 vs 2,333).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon E5472

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1060G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌788.9% higher power demand at 80W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1060G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060G7 better than Xeon E5472?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5472 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1060G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5472 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1060G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Xeon E5472 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5472

The Xeon E5472 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $1,022.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1060G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5472's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5472 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-1060G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5472 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060G7 scores 2,322 against the Xeon E5472's 2,333 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5472. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5472.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Xeon E5472
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+27%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,322	2,333
Geekbench 6 Single	1,523	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1060G7 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5472 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Xeon E5472
Socket	BGA1440	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7) / not specified (Xeon E5472). The Core i7-1060G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics), while the Xeon E5472 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.