Core i7-1060G7 vs Pentium G4400T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Pentium G4400T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Pentium G4400T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 35W, a 26W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics, while Pentium G4400T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,322 vs 2,323).

Pentium G4400T

2015

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1060G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Core i7-1060G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌288.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 9W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1060G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060G7 better than Pentium G4400T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-1060G7 is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400T pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Core i7-1060G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G4400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060G7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-1060G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4400T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (36.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Pentium G4400T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G4400T

The Pentium G4400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,323 points. Launch price was $64.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1060G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G4400T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-1060G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4400T — a 26.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-1060G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Pentium G4400T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060G7 scores 2,322 against the Pentium G4400T's 2,323 — a 0% lead for the Pentium G4400T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Pentium G4400T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+31%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.9 GHz+190%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+167%	3 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,322	2,323
Geekbench 6 Single	1,523	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1060G7 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Pentium G4400T
Socket	BGA1440	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7) / not specified (Pentium G4400T). The Core i7-1060G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics), while the Pentium G4400T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.