Core i7-1060G7 vs Core m5-6Y57

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Core m5-6Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Core m5-6Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics, while Core m5-6Y57 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,322 vs 2,342).
❌100% higher power demand at 9W vs 4.5W.

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 9W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1060G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i7-1060G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1060G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m5-6Y57 better than Core i7-1060G7?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-1060G7 is ahead with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-1060G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m5-6Y57 is the better buy right now. Core m5-6Y57 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-1060G7 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1060G7 vs Core m5-6Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1060G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core m5-6Y57 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-1060G7 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-1060G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060G7 scores 2,322 against the Core m5-6Y57's 2,342 — a 0.9% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Core m5-6Y57
Cores / Threads	4 / 8+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.1 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,322	2,342
Geekbench 6 Single	1,523	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1060G7 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1060G7	Core m5-6Y57
Socket	BGA1440	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-3733	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7) / not specified (Core m5-6Y57). The Core i7-1060G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.