Core m5-6Y57 vs Xeon E5472

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Xeon E5472 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Xeon E5472: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 80W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5472, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon E5472 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5472

2007

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,333 vs 2,342).
❌1677.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m5-6Y57 better than Xeon E5472?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5472 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core m5-6Y57 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m5-6Y57 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m5-6Y57 is the better buy right now. Core m5-6Y57 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5472 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 27 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m5-6Y57 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Xeon E5472 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon E5472

The Xeon E5472 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,333 points. Launch price was $1,022.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5472 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5472 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5472 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5472 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5472 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Xeon E5472's 2,333 — a 0.4% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5472.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Xeon E5472
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	6 MB (total)+2300%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,342	2,333

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5472 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.