Core m5-6Y57 vs Core m7-6Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Core m7-6Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Core m7-6Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m5-6Y57

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $393 MSRP).
✅Draws 5W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,342 vs 2,363).

Core m7-6Y75

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($393 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
❌11277.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m7-6Y75 better than Core m5-6Y57?

Yes. Core m7-6Y75 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m7-6Y75 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m7-6Y75 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m7-6Y75 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core m7-6Y75 comes in 39.9% more expensive on MSRP at $393 MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m5-6Y57 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m7-6Y75 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m5-6Y57 vs Core m7-6Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Core m7-6Y75

The Core m7-6Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,363 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core m5-6Y57 and Core m7-6Y75 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core m7-6Y75 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the Core m7-6Y75 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Core m7-6Y75's 2,363 — a 0.9% lead for the Core m7-6Y75. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Core m7-6Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.2 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,342	2,363

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1515 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Core m7-6Y75
Socket	FCBGA1515	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m5-6Y57 was priced at $281, while the Core m7-6Y75 came in at $393. On launch pricing ($281 vs $393), Core m5-6Y57 was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y57 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Core m7-6Y75 — making the Core m5-6Y57 the 32.4% better value option.

Feature	Core m5-6Y57	Core m7-6Y75
MSRP	$281-28%	$393
Performance per Dollar	8.3+38%	6.0
Release Date	2015	2015

Search Core m5-6Y57 on Amazon

Search Core m7-6Y75 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.