Core m5-6Y57
VS
Xeon E5-2603

Core m5-6Y57 vs Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y57 is positioned at rank 1123 and the Xeon E5-2603 is on rank 825, so the Xeon E5-2603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17870%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3374%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2998%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2316%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
99%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
98%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
98%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
97%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
95%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
94%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
93%
#825
Xeon E5-2603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
95%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Xeon E5-2603
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m5-6Y57 ($281), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($281 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Xeon E5-2603
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y57 and Xeon E5-2603

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

The Xeon E5-2603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,325 points. Launch price was $207.

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2603 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y57 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Xeon E5-2603's 2,325 — a 0.7% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Xeon E5-2603
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+56%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.8 GHz+64%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
10240 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
2,342
2,325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Xeon E5-2603
Socket
FCBGA1515
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0