Core m5-6Y57
VS
Core i3-3240

Core m5-6Y57 vs Core i3-3240

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-3240

2 Cores4 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y57 is positioned at rank 1123 and the Core i3-3240 is on rank 847, so the Core i3-3240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17492%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16529%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12001%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3615%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2864%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2505%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1435%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1416%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1289%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1289%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1275%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1241%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1223%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1218%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1207%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
100%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3240 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core m5-6Y57 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Core i3-3240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-3240 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 95% cheaper ($15 vs $281) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore m5-6Y57Core i3-3240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1781%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y57 and Core i3-3240

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Core i3-3240

The Core i3-3240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,352 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

Both the Core m5-6Y57 and Core i3-3240 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-3240 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-3240 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-3240 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Core i3-3240's 2,352 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3240. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3240.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i3-3240
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+21%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+209%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,342
2,352
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-3240 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i3-3240
Socket
FCBGA1515
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core m5-6Y57 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Core i3-3240 debuted at $132. At current prices ($281 vs $15), the Core i3-3240 is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m5-6Y57 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 156.8 pts/$ for the Core i3-3240 — making the Core i3-3240 the 179.8% better value option.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57Core i3-3240
MSRP
$281
$132-53%
Avg Price (30d)
$281
$15-95%
Performance per Dollar
8.3
156.8+1789%
Release Date
2015
2012