Core m5-6Y57
VS
A8-3870K

Core m5-6Y57 vs A8-3870K

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
VS
AMD

A8-3870K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y57 is positioned at rank 1123 and the A8-3870K is on rank 502, so the A8-3870K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1134
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1135
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1136
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1137
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7926%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7489%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5438%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1298%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1135%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
584%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
578%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
562%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
554%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
547%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
99%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
99%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#502
A8-3870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
99%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-3870K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core m5-6Y57 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore m5-6Y57A8-3870K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore m5-6Y57A8-3870K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y57 and A8-3870K

Intel

Core m5-6Y57

The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

A8-3870K

The A8-3870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,360 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core m5-6Y57 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-3870K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core m5-6Y57 versus 3 GHz on the A8-3870K — a 6.9% clock advantage for the A8-3870K (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core m5-6Y57 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the A8-3870K uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the A8-3870K's 2,360 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-3870K. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 0 kB on the A8-3870K.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57A8-3870K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3 GHz+7%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,342
2,360
Geekbench 6 Single
380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-3870K uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57A8-3870K
Socket
FCBGA1515
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m5-6Y57) / AMD-V (A8-3870K). The A8-3870K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6550D), while the Core m5-6Y57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3870K targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3870K rivals Core i3-2125.

FeatureCore m5-6Y57A8-3870K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Gaming Desktop