CPU
GPU
Core m5-6Y57
Xeon X5365
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m5-6Y57 is positioned at rank 1123 and the Xeon X5365 is on rank 823, so the Xeon X5365 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y57
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5365
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m5-6Y57 | Xeon X5365 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m5-6Y57 | Xeon X5365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m5-6Y57 and Xeon X5365
Core m5-6Y57
The Core m5-6Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,342 points. Launch price was $281.
Xeon X5365
The Xeon X5365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,331 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core m5-6Y57 is built on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core m5-6Y57 scores 2,342 against the Xeon X5365's 2,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Core m5-6Y57. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y57 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5365.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y57 | Xeon X5365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3 GHz+173% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8 MB L2 Cache+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | — |
| PassMark | 2,342 | 2,331 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m5-6Y57 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5365 uses LGA771 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m5-6Y57 | Xeon X5365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m5-6Y57 and Xeon X5365
