Xeon E5606 vs Xeon X3360

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5606 vs Xeon X3360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5606 vs Xeon X3360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5606

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3360 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon X3360

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,424 vs 2,443).
❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5606 better than Xeon X3360?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon X3360 is ahead with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5606 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon X3360 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5606 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5606 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5606 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5606 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5606 vs Xeon X3360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5606

The Xeon E5606 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,443 points. Launch price was $46.

Xeon X3360

The Xeon X3360 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5606 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5606 scores 2,443 against the Xeon X3360's 2,424 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5606. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5606 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3360.

Feature	Xeon E5606	Xeon X3360
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	2.83 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	2,443	2,424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5606 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X3360 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.