Xeon E5620
VS
Athlon II X4 651

Xeon E5620 vs Athlon II X4 651

Intel

Xeon E5620

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 651

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5620 is positioned at rank 649 and the Athlon II X4 651 is on rank 505, so the Athlon II X4 651 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11476%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2167%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1925%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1487%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
100%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
96%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
94%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
94%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
94%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
94%
#649
Xeon E5620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
100%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
98%
#654
Xeon E3-1225
MSRP: $224|Avg: $205
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 651

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8001%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7560%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5489%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1310%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1146%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
656%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
648%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
590%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
590%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
583%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
567%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
559%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
557%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
552%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
100%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
100%
#510
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#514
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
98%
#517
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#518
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
97%
#519
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5620 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5620Athlon II X4 651
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($92)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X4 651 ($92), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($92 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5620Athlon II X4 651
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($92)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5620 and Athlon II X4 651

Intel

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

AMD

Athlon II X4 651

The Athlon II X4 651 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,584 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon II X4 651's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 651 — a 12% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 651 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5620 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5620 scores 3,621 against the Athlon II X4 651's 3,584 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5620. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5620 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 651.

FeatureXeon E5620Athlon II X4 651
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz
3 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,621+1%
3,584
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5620 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5620Athlon II X4 651
Socket
LGA1366
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16