Xeon E5620
VS
PRO A10-9700

Xeon E5620 vs PRO A10-9700

Intel

Xeon E5620

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2010
VS
AMD

PRO A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5620 is positioned at rank 649 and the PRO A10-9700 is on rank 295, so the PRO A10-9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11476%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2167%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1925%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1487%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
100%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
96%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
94%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
94%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
94%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
94%
#649
Xeon E5620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
100%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
98%
#654
Xeon E3-1225
MSRP: $224|Avg: $205
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-9700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4329%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4091%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2970%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
895%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
709%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
620%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
355%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
319%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
319%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
316%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
307%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
303%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
302%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
299%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
96%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
95%
#295
PRO A10-9700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The PRO A10-9700 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5620PRO A10-9700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5620 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5620PRO A10-9700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5620 and PRO A10-9700

Intel

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

AMD

PRO A10-9700

The PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-9700's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A10-9700 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5620 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5620 scores 3,621 against the PRO A10-9700's 3,600 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5620.

FeatureXeon E5620PRO A10-9700
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz
3.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,621
3,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5620 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-9700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5620PRO A10-9700
Socket
LGA1366
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%