Xeon E5620
VS
Athlon X4 950

Xeon E5620 vs Athlon X4 950

Intel

Xeon E5620

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 950

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5620 is positioned at rank 649 and the Athlon X4 950 is on rank 344, so the Athlon X4 950 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
11476%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2167%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1925%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1487%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
100%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
96%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
94%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
94%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
94%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
94%
#649
Xeon E5620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
100%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
98%
#654
Xeon E3-1225
MSRP: $224|Avg: $205
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5055%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4777%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3468%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1045%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
828%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
724%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
415%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
409%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
373%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
373%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
368%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
359%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
354%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
352%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
349%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
100%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
100%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
99%
#311
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#312
Core i9-10940X
MSRP: $784|Avg: $460
98%
#313
Core i9-10920X
MSRP: $689|Avg: $430
98%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
97%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
97%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
97%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
97%
#344
Athlon X4 950
MSRP: $58|Avg: $15
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon X4 950 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5620Athlon X4 950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5620 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5620Athlon X4 950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5620 and Athlon X4 950

Intel

Xeon E5620

The Xeon E5620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,621 points. Launch price was $35.

AMD

Athlon X4 950

The Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,576 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon X4 950's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon E5620 versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 950 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 950 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5620 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 950 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5620 scores 3,621 against the Athlon X4 950's 3,576 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5620. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5620 vs 0 kB on the Athlon X4 950.

FeatureXeon E5620Athlon X4 950
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz
3.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,621+1%
3,576
Geekbench 6 Single
656
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,637
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5620 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 950 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5620Athlon X4 950
Socket
LGA1366
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5620) / AMD-V (Athlon X4 950).

FeatureXeon E5620Athlon X4 950
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V