
Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F

Xeon E7-4880 v2

Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-4880 v2
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($185) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($276) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+47%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($185) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($276) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E7-4880 v2 and Core Ultra 7 265F

Xeon E7-4880 v2
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

Core Ultra 7 265F
The Core Ultra 7 265F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,161 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265F offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265F — a 52.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265F is built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4880 v2 scores 48,435 against the Core Ultra 7 265F's 49,161 — a 1.5% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265F. L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265F.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 15 / 30 | 20 / 20+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+71% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 37.5 MB+25% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 3 nm-86% |
| Architecture | — | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 48,435 | 49,161+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 25,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265F uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265F — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 256 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) vs 2 (Core Ultra 7 265F). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265F) — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 7 265F).
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+31900% | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 | 256 GB+17476167% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265F targets High Performance Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 launched at $6619 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265F debuted at $369. At current prices ($185 vs $276), the Xeon E7-4880 v2 is $91 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-4880 v2 delivers 261.8 pts/$ vs 178.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265F — making the Xeon E7-4880 v2 the 38% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Core Ultra 7 265F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6619 | $369-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $185-33% | $276 |
| Performance per Dollar | 261.8+47% | 178.1 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















