
Xeon E7-4880 v2

Xeon W-3345
Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Xeon W-3345 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Xeon W-3345 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Xeon W-3345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E7-4880 v2
2014Why buy it
- β +0.6% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- βNo AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-3345
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $4,120 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
- β Delivers 163.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
- β 220% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 40) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (48,140 vs 48,435).
- β92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3345 better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs Xeon W-3345 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7-4880 v2
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3345
The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 packs 15 cores / 30 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Xeon W-3345 has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 β a 25.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W-3345 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4880 v2 scores 48,435 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 β a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E7-4880 v2. L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 15 / 30 | 24 / 48+60% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 37.5 MB+4% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | β | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm-55% |
| Architecture | β | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 48,435 | 48,140 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3345 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3345 β the Xeon W-3345 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3345 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 β 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) vs 8 (Xeon W-3345). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) vs 128 (Xeon W-3345) β the Xeon W-3345 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | 3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 | 4096+167% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 128+220% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3345 supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E7-4880 v2 was priced at $6619, while the Xeon W-3345 came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($6619 vs $2499), Xeon W-3345 was $4120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7-4880 v2 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 β making the Xeon W-3345 the 89.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E7-4880 v2 | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6619 | $2499-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3 | 19.3+164% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















