Core i9-13900F vs Xeon E7-4880 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon E7-4880 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,095 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1176.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,435 vs 48,934).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i9-13900F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900F better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4880 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 28.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900F is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900F comes in $6,095 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $6,619 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1176.2% better value on MSRP (93.4 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900F vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 55.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-13900F. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+60%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+77%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	37.5 MB+4%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	48,934+1%	48,435
Cinebench R23 Multi	37,326	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,801	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,199	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900F versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the Core i9-13900F supports 250% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900F) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+250%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i9-13900F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900F was priced at $524, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 came in at $6619. On launch pricing ($524 vs $6619), Core i9-13900F was $6095 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the Core i9-13900F the 170.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP	$524-92%	$6619
Performance per Dollar	93.4+1179%	7.3
Release Date	2023	2014

Search Core i9-13900F on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-4880 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.