PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+92% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Costs $5,424 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Delivers 458.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌46.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 130W.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 190W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,435 vs 48,810).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6517P better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?

Yes. Xeon 6517P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6517P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 92% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6517P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6517P comes in $5,424 cheaper on MSRP at $1,195 MSRP versus $6,619 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 458.2% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 92% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 38 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 15/30, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon E7-4880 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6517P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon 6517P has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon 6517P is built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon 6517P scores 48,810 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+7%	15 / 30
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+35%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	72 MB (total)+92%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 3 nm-86%	22 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	—
PassMark	48,810	48,435

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6517P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6517P versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the Xeon 6517P supports 300% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1536 — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6517P) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6517P) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the Xeon 6517P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Socket	LGA4710	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+300%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	4096+167%	1536
RAM Channels	8+100%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+120%	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6517P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554; Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6517P was priced at $1195, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 came in at $6619. On launch pricing ($1195 vs $6619), Xeon 6517P was $5424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6517P delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the Xeon 6517P the 139.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP	$1195-82%	$6619
Performance per Dollar	40.8+459%	7.3
Release Date	2025	2014

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-4880 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.