Xeon 6517P vs Xeon 6736P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon 6736P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon 6736P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,156 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $3,351 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 205W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 50,072).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (72 MB vs 144 MB).

Xeon 6736P

2025

Why buy it

✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 72 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($3,351 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6517P better than Xeon 6736P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6517P is ahead with a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6736P pulls ahead with 2.6% better PassMark. Xeon 6736P also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 72 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6736P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.6% better PassMark, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 72 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6517P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6517P comes in $2,156 cheaper on MSRP at $1,195 MSRP versus $3,351 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon 6736P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.6% better PassMark. It is also 173.4% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 14.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6736P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 72 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 36 cores / 72 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon 6736P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

Xeon 6736P

The Xeon 6736P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 50,072 points. Launch price was $3,351.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6517P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6736P offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon 6736P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6736P — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Xeon 6517P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture using a Intel 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon 6517P scores 48,810 against the Xeon 6736P's 50,072 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon 6736P. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6736P.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon 6736P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	36 / 72+125%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+2%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	72 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm	Intel 3 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	48,810	50,072+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4710 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 6400 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 88 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6736P).

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon 6736P
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	6400	6400
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554; Xeon 6736P rivals EPYC 9684X.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon 6736P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6517P was priced at $1195, while the Xeon 6736P came in at $3351. On launch pricing ($1195 vs $3351), Xeon 6517P was $2156 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6517P delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6736P — making the Xeon 6517P the 92.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon 6736P
MSRP	$1195-64%	$3351
Performance per Dollar	40.8+174%	14.9
Release Date	2025	2025

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6736P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.