Xeon 6517P vs Xeon w7-3445

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon w7-3445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon w7-3445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅+37.1% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Costs $794 less on MSRP ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $1,989 MSRP).
✅Draws 190W instead of 270W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3445 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (48,810 vs 48,991).

Xeon w7-3445

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅27.3% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($1,989 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
❌42.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 190W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3445 better than Xeon 6517P?

Yes. Xeon w7-3445 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w7-3445 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-3445 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3445 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6517P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon w7-3445 comes in 66.4% more expensive on MSRP at $1,989 MSRP versus $1,195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6517P is also 65.8% better value on MSRP (40.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and 37.1% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 53 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6517P vs Xeon w7-3445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

Xeon w7-3445

The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6517P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-3445 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-3445 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon 6517P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6517P scores 48,810 against the Xeon w7-3445's 48,991 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon w7-3445
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.8 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	72 MB (total)+37%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-57%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	48,810	48,991

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6517P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-3445 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6517P versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 — the Xeon 6517P supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6517P) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3445) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P) and W790 (Xeon w7-3445).

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon w7-3445
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6400+33%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88	112+27%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554; Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon w7-3445
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6517P was priced at $1195, while the Xeon w7-3445 came in at $1989. On launch pricing ($1195 vs $1989), Xeon 6517P was $794 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6517P delivers 40.8 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3445 — making the Xeon 6517P the 49.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6517P	Xeon w7-3445
MSRP	$1195-40%	$1989
Performance per Dollar	40.8+66%	24.6
Release Date	2025	2023

Search Xeon 6517P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3445 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.