PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon W3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon W3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7330

2007

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $186 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 294.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 25.7 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon W3670

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,424 vs 6,491).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.7 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7330 better than Xeon W3670?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W3670 is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Xeon W3670 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7330 is the better buy right now. Xeon E7330 comes in $186 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W3670 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 294.7% better value on MSRP (101.4 vs 25.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W3670 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon W3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7330

The Xeon E7330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,491 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W3670 is built on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7330 scores 6,491 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E7330. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7330 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon W3670
Cores / Threads	—	6 / 12
Boost Clock	—	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	—	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,491+1%	6,424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7330 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon W3670
Socket	PGA604	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E7330 was priced at $64, while the Xeon W3670 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($64 vs $250), Xeon E7330 was $186 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7330 delivers 101.4 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Xeon E7330 the 119.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon W3670
MSRP	$64-74%	$250
Performance per Dollar	101.4+295%	25.7
Release Date	2007	2010

Search Xeon E7330 on Amazon

Search Xeon W3670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.