PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon X5675 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon X5675: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7330

2007

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,376 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2175.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 4.5 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $1,440 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5675 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon X5675

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,418 vs 6,491).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($1,440 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7330 better than Xeon X5675?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon X5675 is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon X5675 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7330 is the better buy right now. Xeon E7330 comes in $1,376 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $1,440 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5675 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2175.6% better value on MSRP (101.4 vs 4.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon X5675 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E7330 vs Xeon X5675 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E7330

The Xeon E7330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,491 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X5675

The Xeon X5675 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,418 points. Launch price was $162.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon X5675 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7330 scores 6,491 against the Xeon X5675's 6,418 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E7330. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7330 vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5675.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon X5675
Cores / Threads	—	6 / 12
Boost Clock	—	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.06 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	12288 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	—	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,491+1%	6,418

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7330 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5675 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon X5675
Socket	PGA604	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E7330) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5675). Primary use case: Xeon X5675 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5675 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon X5675
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E7330 was priced at $64, while the Xeon X5675 came in at $1440. On launch pricing ($64 vs $1440), Xeon E7330 was $1376 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E7330 delivers 101.4 pts/$ vs 4.5 pts/$ for the Xeon X5675 — making the Xeon E7330 the 183.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E7330	Xeon X5675
MSRP	$64-96%	$1440
Performance per Dollar	101.4+2153%	4.5
Release Date	2007	2011

Search Xeon E7330 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5675 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.