Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E7330

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E7330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E7330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.2 vs 101.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Xeon E7330

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 357.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 101.4 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,491 vs 6,523).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 10 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1620 v2 better than Xeon E7330?

Yes. Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1620 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1620 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7330 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-1620 v2 comes in 359.4% more expensive on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7330 is also 357.1% better value on MSRP (101.4 vs 22.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1620 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and 66.7% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 6 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E7330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Xeon E7330

The Xeon E7330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,491 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 scores 6,523 against the Xeon E7330's 6,491 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7330.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon E7330
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+54%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+67%	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	—
PassMark	6,523	6,491

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7330 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon E7330
Socket	LGA2011	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 was priced at $294, while the Xeon E7330 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($294 vs $64), Xeon E7330 was $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v2 delivers 22.2 pts/$ vs 101.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7330 — making the Xeon E7330 the 128.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon E7330
MSRP	$294	$64-78%
Performance per Dollar	22.2	101.4+357%
Release Date	2013	2007

Search Xeon E5-1620 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E7330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.