
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon E7340

Xeon E5-1620 v2

Xeon E7340
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is positioned at rank 594 and the Xeon E7340 is on rank 470, so the Xeon E7340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v2
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7340
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1620 v2 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($132) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1620 v2 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+163%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($132) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon E7340

Xeon E5-1620 v2
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Xeon E7340
The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 scores 6,523 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E7340. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v2 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | — |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+54% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+25% | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | — |
| PassMark | 6,523 | 6,544 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v2 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Xeon E7340 debuted at $213. At current prices ($50 vs $132), the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is $82 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v2 delivers 130.5 pts/$ vs 49.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v2 the 89.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v2 | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $213-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-62% | $132 |
| Performance per Dollar | 130.5+163% | 49.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











