Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4112

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4112 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4112: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Costs $591 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
✅Delivers 200.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,523 vs 6,536).
❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4112

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 22.2 PassMark/$ ($885 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4112 better than Xeon E5-1620 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-1620 v2 is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4112 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-1620 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 21.2% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4112 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4112 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1620 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Silver 4112 comes in 201.0% more expensive on MSRP at $885 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1620 v2 is also 200.4% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4112 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4112 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

Xeon Silver 4112

The Xeon Silver 4112 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,536 points. Launch price was $473.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Xeon Silver 4112 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4112 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 scores 6,523 against the Xeon Silver 4112's 6,536 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Silver 4112. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4112.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon Silver 4112
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+30%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+21%	8.25 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	6,523	6,536

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon Silver 4112
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 was priced at $294, while the Xeon Silver 4112 came in at $885. On launch pricing ($294 vs $885), Xeon E5-1620 v2 was $591 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v2 delivers 22.2 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4112 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v2 the 100.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v2	Xeon Silver 4112
MSRP	$294-67%	$885
Performance per Dollar	22.2+200%	7.4
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Xeon E5-1620 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4112 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.