Core i7-4980HQ vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4980HQ vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4980HQ vs Xeon E5-1620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4980HQ

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 47W instead of 130W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1620 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-1620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,523 vs 6,539).
❌Launch MSRP is still $294 MSRP, while Core i7-4980HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌176.6% higher power demand at 130W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4980HQ better than Xeon E5-1620 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1620 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4980HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4980HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4980HQ is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1620 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-4980HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1620 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4980HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4980HQ vs Xeon E5-1620 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4980HQ

The Core i7-4980HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,539 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-1620 v2

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4980HQ and Xeon E5-1620 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4980HQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4980HQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-4980HQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4980HQ scores 6,539 against the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 6,523 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4980HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4980HQ vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2.

Feature	Core i7-4980HQ	Xeon E5-1620 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4 GHz+3%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Crystalwell (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	6,539	6,523

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4980HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.