Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($52) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($52) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon E5-1620 v2
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,523 points. Launch price was $315.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon E5-1620 v2's 6,523 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1620 v2. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 10 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-45% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| PassMark | 6,499 | 6,523 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon E5-1620 v2). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G launched at $89 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1620 v2 debuted at $294. At current prices ($52 vs $50), the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G delivers 125.0 pts/$ vs 130.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 v2 — making the Xeon E5-1620 v2 the 4.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-70% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $52 | $50-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.0 | 130.5+4% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Xeon E5-1620 v2
