
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Xeon E3-1240L v5
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240L v5 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240L v5 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E3-1240L v5 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1240L v5 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (6,499 vs 6,547).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1240L v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $89 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240L v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E3-1240L v5
2015Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
- β Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1240L v5 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E3-1240L v5 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240L v5
The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $278.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1240L v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 β a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the Zen+ (2018β2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon E3-1240L v5's 6,547 β a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1240L v5. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v5.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E3-1240L v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+25% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018β2019) | Skylake-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 6,499 | 6,547 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E3-1240L v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240L v5). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E3-1240L v5 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E3-1240L v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













