
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Xeon E7340
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E7340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7340 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,499 vs 6,544).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Xeon E7340
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E7340 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E7340
The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E7340. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | — |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB L2 Cache+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| Process | 12 nm-82% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 6,499 | 6,544 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | PGA604 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon E7340). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E7340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 8 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was priced at $89, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($89 vs $213), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G delivers 73.0 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 81.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G | Xeon E7340 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $89-58% | $213 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.0+138% | 30.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














