Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E7340

80 WW2007
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $124 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
  • Delivers 137.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Xeon E7340 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7340 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,499 vs 6,544).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7340 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E7340 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E7340 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E7340 comes in 139.3% more expensive on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,499 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is built on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G scores 6,499 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E7340. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3200GXeon E7340
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
Process
12 nm-82%
65 nm
Architecture
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
6,499
6,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3200GXeon E7340
Socket
AM4
PGA604
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) / not specified (Xeon E7340). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Xeon E7340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3200GXeon E7340
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was priced at $89, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($89 vs $213), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G delivers 73.0 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 81.5% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 3 PRO 3200GXeon E7340
MSRP
$89-58%
$213
Performance per Dollar
73.0+138%
30.7
Release Date
2019
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.