
Core i7-4820K

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4820K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($332 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $243 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 272.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-4820K needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4820K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,499 vs 6,515).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4820K better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4820K
The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4820K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4820K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4820K scores 6,515 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 6,499 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4820K. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.
| Feature | Core i7-4820K | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+150% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | 12 nm-45% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 6,515 | 6,499 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4820K | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4820K) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-4820K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-4820K | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4820K was priced at $332, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G came in at $89. On launch pricing ($332 vs $89), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4820K delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 73.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 115.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4820K | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $332 | $89-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 73.0+272% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














