Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Intel

Core i7-4820K

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4820K

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($332 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $243 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
  • Delivers 272.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-4820K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4820K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,499 vs 6,515).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4820K better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Yes. Core i7-4820K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4820K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4820K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4820K is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-4820K comes in 273.0% more expensive on MSRP at $332 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 6,499 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4820K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4820K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4820K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4820K scores 6,515 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 6,499 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4820K. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

FeatureCore i7-4820KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+3%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+150%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm
12 nm-45%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
6,515
6,499
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4820KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Socket
LGA2011
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4820K) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-4820K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-4820KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4820K was priced at $332, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G came in at $89. On launch pricing ($332 vs $89), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4820K delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 73.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 115.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4820KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP
$332
$89-73%
Performance per Dollar
19.6
73.0+272%
Release Date
2013
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.