Core i7-4820K vs Xeon E7340

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon E7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon E7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4820K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,515 vs 6,544).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($332 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Xeon E7340

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4820K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7340 better than Core i7-4820K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7340 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4820K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7340 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7340 is the better buy right now. Xeon E7340 comes in $119 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $332 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4820K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.6% better value on MSRP (30.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4820K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon E7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon E7340

The Xeon E7340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 6,544 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4820K is built on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-4820K scores 6,515 against the Xeon E7340's 6,544 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E7340. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K vs 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E7340.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon E7340
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+54%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+25%	8 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	—
PassMark	6,515	6,544

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7340 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon E7340
Socket	LGA2011	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4820K was priced at $332, while the Xeon E7340 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($332 vs $213), Xeon E7340 was $119 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4820K delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E7340 — making the Xeon E7340 the 44.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon E7340
MSRP	$332	$213-36%
Performance per Dollar	19.6	30.7+57%
Release Date	2013	2007

Search Core i7-4820K on Amazon

Search Xeon E7340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.