Core i7-4820K vs Xeon Silver 4112

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon Silver 4112 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon Silver 4112: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4820K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Costs $553 less on MSRP ($332 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
✅Delivers 165.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($332 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,515 vs 6,536).
❌52.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4112

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 130W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4820K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($885 MSRP vs $332 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4112 better than Core i7-4820K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4112 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4820K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4112 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4112 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon Silver 4112 comes in 166.6% more expensive on MSRP at $885 MSRP versus $332 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-4820K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 165.7% better value on paper (19.6 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4112 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4820K vs Xeon Silver 4112 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon Silver 4112

The Xeon Silver 4112 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,536 points. Launch price was $473.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4820K and Xeon Silver 4112 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4112 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4820K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-4820K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4820K scores 6,515 against the Xeon Silver 4112's 6,536 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4112. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4112.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon Silver 4112
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+30%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)+21%	8.25 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	6,515	6,536

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4112 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon Silver 4112
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4820K was priced at $332, while the Xeon Silver 4112 came in at $885. On launch pricing ($332 vs $885), Core i7-4820K was $553 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4820K delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4112 — making the Core i7-4820K the 90.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon Silver 4112
MSRP	$332-62%	$885
Performance per Dollar	19.6+165%	7.4
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Core i7-4820K on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4112 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.