Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4116

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4116 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4116: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5115

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 17 MB).

Xeon Silver 4116

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 14 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,918 vs 15,017).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5115 better than Xeon Silver 4116?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4116 is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5115 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon Silver 4116 also has the bigger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5115 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5115 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4116 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4116 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5115

The Xeon Gold 5115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,017 points. Launch price was $1,221.

Xeon Silver 4116

The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5115 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5115 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5115 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5115 scores 15,017 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5115. L3 cache: 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5115 vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5115	Xeon Silver 4116
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	13.75 MB	16.5 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	10 MB+900%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	15,017	14,918