Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4210R

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4210R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4210R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5115

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,017 vs 15,188).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4210R

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5115 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4210R better than Xeon Gold 5115?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5115 is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4210R pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4210R is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4210R still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4210R comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4210R makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 5115 vs Xeon Silver 4210R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5115

The Xeon Gold 5115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,017 points. Launch price was $1,221.

Xeon Silver 4210R

The Xeon Silver 4210R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,188 points. Launch price was $511.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5115 and Xeon Silver 4210R share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5115 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4210R — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5115 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4210R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5115 scores 15,017 against the Xeon Silver 4210R's 15,188 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Silver 4210R. Both processors carry 13.75 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5115	Xeon Silver 4210R
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	13.75 MB	13.75 MB
L2 Cache	10 MB	10 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	15,017	15,188+1%