Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Gold 6134

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5118

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6134 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6134

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,744).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,214 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5118 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5118 better than Xeon Gold 6134?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6134 is ahead with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5118 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6134 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5118 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5118 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6134 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 5118 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,214 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6134 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6134 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5118 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5118

The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Gold 6134

The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5118 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5118 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6134 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5118 scores 16,744 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 5118. L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5118 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5118	Xeon Gold 6134
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	16.5 MB	24.75 MB+50%
L2 Cache	12 MB+50%	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	16,744+1%	16,519

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Xeon Gold 5118 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6134 — the Xeon Gold 6134 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 768 of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 5118) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6134).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5118	Xeon Gold 6134
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity	768	768
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5118 rivals EPYC 7301.