Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Silver 4214

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Silver 4214 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Silver 4214: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5118

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.

Xeon Silver 4214

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,472 vs 16,744).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5118 better than Xeon Silver 4214?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5118 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5118 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5118 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5118 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4214 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 5118 vs Xeon Silver 4214 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5118

The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Silver 4214

The Xeon Silver 4214 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,472 points. Launch price was $694.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5118 and Xeon Silver 4214 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4214 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5118 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4214 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5118 scores 16,744 against the Xeon Silver 4214's 16,472 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5118. Both processors carry 16.5 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5118	Xeon Silver 4214
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+5%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16.5 MB	16.5 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB	12 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	16,744+2%	16,472