Xeon Gold 5220
Popular choices:
Xeon Gold 6140
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5220
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6140
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5220 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,187 vs 24,480).
Xeon Gold 5220
2019Xeon Gold 6140
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5220 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,187 vs 24,480).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5220 better than Xeon Gold 6140?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 146 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 612 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 605 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 225 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 563 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5220 and Xeon Gold 6140
Xeon Gold 5220
Xeon Gold 5220
The Xeon Gold 5220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 24,480 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Xeon Gold 6140
Xeon Gold 6140
The Xeon Gold 6140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,187 points. Launch price was $2,445.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 5220 and Xeon Gold 6140 share an identical 18-core/36-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6140 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5220 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6140 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5220 scores 24,480 against the Xeon Gold 6140's 24,187 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5220. Both processors carry 24.75 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 18 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 24,480+1% | 24,187 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5220) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6140). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6140 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5220 | Xeon Gold 6140 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Gold 5220 and Xeon Gold 6140
