
Core Ultra 7 155H

Xeon Gold 5220
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 5220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 5220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 5220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 5220 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 5220.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5220, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon Gold 5220
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,480 vs 24,705).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 155H better than Xeon Gold 5220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 5220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Xeon Gold 5220
The Xeon Gold 5220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 24,480 points. Launch price was $1,555.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5220 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 5220 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5220 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Gold 5220's 24,480 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5220.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+73% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24.75 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 18 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,705 | 24,480 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,433 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5220 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5220). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 5220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 5220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance / AI | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














