
Core Ultra 7 155H

Xeon Gold 6143
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 6143 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 6143 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 6143: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Xeon Gold 6143 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon Gold 6143.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,786).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 6143
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $342 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6143 better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Xeon Gold 6143 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

Xeon Gold 6143
The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, matching the Xeon Gold 6143's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H is built on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6143. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+36% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 24,705 | 24,786 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,433 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6143). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Xeon Gold 6143 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Xeon Gold 6143 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance / AI | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














