Core Ultra 7 155H
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,705).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 155H better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 155H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's 24,613 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 24,705 | 24,613 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,384 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,433 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (Ryzen AI Max PRO 380). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 155H | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance / AI | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 155H and Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
