Core Ultra 7 155H vs M3 Pro 11-Core

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 155H vs M3 Pro 11-Core FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 155H vs M3 Pro 11-Core: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 155H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while M3 Pro 11-Core needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike M3 Pro 11-Core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,861).

M3 Pro 11-Core

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.

Quick Answers

So, is M3 Pro 11-Core better than Core Ultra 7 155H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 7 155H is ahead with a 22.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, M3 Pro 11-Core pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M3 Pro 11-Core is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 11 cores and 11 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

M3 Pro 11-Core still makes the most sense overall. M3 Pro 11-Core comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M3 Pro 11-Core is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Ultra 7 155H vs M3 Pro 11-Core Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

M3 Pro 11-Core

The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the M3 Pro 11-Core offers 11 cores / 11 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H is built on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the M3 Pro 11-Core's 24,861 — a 0.6% lead for the M3 Pro 11-Core.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	M3 Pro 11-Core
Cores / Threads	16 / 22+45%	11 / 11
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+18%	4.06 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+38%	2.748 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Meteor Lake-H (2023)	—
PassMark	24,705	24,861
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,650	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,384	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,433	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Pro 11-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	M3 Pro 11-Core
Socket	FCBGA2049	none
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (M3 Pro 11-Core). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the M3 Pro 11-Core requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 155H	M3 Pro 11-Core
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Thin-and-light Performance / AI	—