Core Ultra 7 155H
VS
M3 Pro 11-Core

Core Ultra 7 155H vs M3 Pro 11-Core

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
VS

M3 Pro 11-Core

11 Cores11 ThrdWMax: 4.06 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 155H

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
102%
#69
Core Ultra 7 155H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
95%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M3 Pro 11-Core

#4
M3 Pro 11-Core
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
79%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
74%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
73%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
69%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 155H leads in gaming performance. However, the M3 Pro 11-Core is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 7 155HM3 Pro 11-Core
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-H (2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 7 155HM3 Pro 11-Core
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 155H and M3 Pro 11-Core

Intel

Core Ultra 7 155H

The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.

M3 Pro 11-Core

The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 155H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the M3 Pro 11-Core offers 11 cores / 11 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 155H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 155H is built on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 155H scores 24,705 against the M3 Pro 11-Core's 24,861 — a 0.6% lead for the M3 Pro 11-Core.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HM3 Pro 11-Core
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+45%
11 / 11
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+18%
4.06 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+38%
2.748 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
PassMark
24,705
24,861
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,650
Geekbench 6 Single
2,384
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 155H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Pro 11-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HM3 Pro 11-Core
Socket
FCBGA2049
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H) / not specified (M3 Pro 11-Core). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the M3 Pro 11-Core requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 155HM3 Pro 11-Core
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance / AI