
Core i7-13705H
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 155H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13705H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Core i7-13705H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13705H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,905).
Core i7-13705H
2023Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores), while Core i7-13705H needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13705H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 155H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 7 155H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,705 vs 24,905).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13705H better than Core Ultra 7 155H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13705H and Core Ultra 7 155H

Core i7-13705H
Core i7-13705H
The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Core Ultra 7 155H's 24,705 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-13705H. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 22+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+4% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,905 | 24,705 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,384 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13705H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H). The Core Ultra 7 155H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)), while the Core i7-13705H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13705H | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Thin-and-light Performance / AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













